mikhail_golubev ([info]mikhail_golubev) wrote,
@ 2006-03-09 20:35:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Letters

Dear Mikhail Golubev, today your "Understanding the King's Indian" arrived via post and I am going to write a review on it on http://www.berlinerschachverband.de/rezensionen In the introduction you say that there will be a weblog on this book - which is a fantastic idea. I am just a 2000 amateur but can't get enough of the King's Indian, even if I should for a broader view on chess. But I love to analyze and play that position. Probably I can contribute an interesting line to your analysis. I must admit it's not my own idea but I found it somewhere in Chessbase magazine. In game 11, Malakhatko - Golubev, instead of the inaccuracy 14 Nb3, you give Kramnik's famous 14 a4! you have B1) 15...g5 played by Kasparov and B2) 15...Nh5!?. In my old analysis, 15...h5!? remained interesting, with ideas such as Bg4 to provoke f3 and after g2-g3 the knight might give that check on h3. My main line goes 16 Nb5 Bg4 17 f3 Bd7 18 Bb2 h4. Hope it's interesting for you - now I can't wait to read the book!

MG: Maybe! But White can try to prevent ...h4 (by h4 or by Nf3).

In the notes of Van Wely-Golubev, Romanian Superliga (Sovata) 2000, you write about 19.Rf2!? "The only way to play for a win. 19 Nxa8 Qxg3+ with perpetual check was Pachman-Taimanov, Capablanca memorial 1967." In fact, 19 Nxa8 should lose after Qxg3 20 Kh1 Nh5! - it's very hard to find a parachute for White here. All dearest regards, Fernando Offermann

MG: 20...Nh5! seems to be an interesting suggestion. Black has a very strong attack indeed. I am not sure if he is winning, but can believe that you are right. Alas, White, normally, would avoid this line anyway because a draw by perpetual check hardly can suit him.

Hi, I am a German FM and found with support of my silicon friend a big improvement in the Kozul Gambit for White: In your line d31) of your excellent book white has 18.Bxa6!! N +- next 19.Qc2 and there is no real compensation after rf7 qc7: qf8 like in the 18.a3? line!

What do you think?

MG: Well, there are several Kozul's gambits in the King's Indian! :-) I believe that what you mean is 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Be2 0-0 6.Nf3 e5 7.0-0 Nc6 8.d5 Ne7 9.Ne1 Nd7 10.Be3 f5 11.f3 f4 12.Bf2 g5 13.Rc1 Ng6 14.c5 Nxc5 15.b4 Na6 16.Nb5 Bd7 17.Nxa7 h5 and now 18.Bxa6 bxa6 19.Qc2. We must try to be be careful with assessments of such crazy lines... The first idea for Black, which comes to mind, is 19…g4!? 20.Qxc7 g3 21.hxg3 fxg3 22.Bxg3 Qg5. Is it so clear?

 

Dear Mr.Golubev, I want to make you a big compliment for your King Indian book!! I think that black players who want to play the King Indian have a good chosen honest openings repertoire. For me you are together with Gallagher, Nunn, Watson and Emms one of the world champions in producing excellent chess books. With friendly chess greetings, Franck Steenbekkers

MG: Many thanks for so kind words. It is really hard to comment! :-) I guess that there are no champions among writers - any book can find its reader.




(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2006-03-28 12:54 am UTC (link)
Hello there! Great book, cool with another
KID devotee apart from Mr Joe Gallagher! :)
I found your game with hébert very interesting.
I had never ever seen that 8.dxe5 and 9.Nd2 line before and now
I believe it's one of the most critical tests! funnily enough, some three
days after I had to book sent home I played black in the swedish leauge,
and yeah guess what line white choose! I had already forgotten about the 9..Nd7!?
option so I went c6. We followed your game until move 12 where white played the
interesting 12..Qb1. I saw no option but to play 12...Ng4 and after 13.Bxg4 13.Bxg4
14. Nc4 14. Nd3 15.f3 15.Be6 16.Nc4 16.Nf4 I thought I was fine, 17.Nxb7 is bad due to Qg5.
But as the game developed I found I was not equal at all. 17.Kh1 17.Qe7 18.Rd1 18.h5 19.Rd2 19.h4 20.h3 20. Bh6 21.Qf1 21.Bg5 22.Qf2 22.f5 23.Ne2 23.Nxh3 24. gxh3 24.f4 25.Bd4. The rest lack importance, I'm toast. Understand I'm not so strong a player but I can't see where I went so wrong. There was time trouble early on, I know 22.f5 was lousy. Is white just much
better after 9...c6?! :) And yeah, this was a long thread, cheers!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re:
[info]mikhail_golubev
2006-03-29 05:30 pm UTC (link)
Many thanks! And apologies: I am playing in Kharkov now, so it will take some time until I will be able to answer sensibly regarding this specific line with Qb1.
(8.dxe5 and 9.Nd2 is interesting, indeed!)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Hebert-Golubev, 12.Qb1
[info]mikhail_golubev
2006-04-15 08:13 pm UTC (link)
In Chess Today (Issue 1522) Jean Hebert commented:

"12.Qb1 is more natural to defend d3 but it also leads to nothing: 12...Ng4 13.Bxg4 Bxg4 14.Nc4 Qd3 15.Nd6 b6"

So, maybe 14...Qd3 (?) Apologies for being slow with looking at this. I just returned home after Kharkov and Bucharest (visited Topalov vs Nisipeanu match).

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2006-05-11 04:18 pm UTC (link)
Dear Mr Golubev,

I appreciated a lot your book "Understanding the King's Indian", which is one of the best chess books of these last years. Thanks to you, I started to play succesfully the KID, but unfortunately I met a few times an annoying variation, which seems to be the "secret plan" for white in the King's Indian. It appears in your book p.13-14, after 9.Ne1 Nd7 10.Nd3 f5 11.Bd2 Nf6 12.f3 f4 14. c5 g5 14.Rc1 Ng6 15.Nb5!?. You suggest 15...Rf7 16.Ba5 b6 17.cxd6 bxa5 18.dxc7 Qf8 unclear. But after 19.Qa4, I could'nt find a clear path to equality. For instance : 19...Bd7 20.Qxa5 a6 21.Nc5, and black'sposition looks very difficult.
Maybe it's better to accept the piece sacrifice after 15..a6 ? But the position still seems easier for white. So what would you play if you had to face 15.Nb5 in a grandmaster game? Thank you.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

RE Anonymous
[info]mikhail_golubev
2006-05-22 06:17 pm UTC (link)
Many thanks for your kind words. And apologies: I was terribly busy, working as journalist at the Mel Masters 2006 in Sofia (the tournament has finished yesterday). Fortunately (!), tomorrow I will have to spend a few hours in the Budapest Airport, and I will definitely try to look at this complex line.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re
[info]mikhail_golubev
2006-07-12 09:41 pm UTC (link)
Apologies: after having a really busy time (Alushta-Foros-Odessa) I understood that it is better to post here what I have for the moment, at least. It seems that 17...bxa5 is too dangerous for Black, as you claimed. If it is true, then only 17...cxd6 remains, hmmm...

1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.c4 Bg7 4.Nc3 0-0 5.e4 d6 6.Be2 e5 7.0-0 Nc6 8.d5 Ne7 9.Ne1 Nd7 10.Nd3 f5 11.Bd2 Nf6 12.f3 f4 13.c5 g5 14.Rc1 Ng6 15.Nb5!? Rf7 16.Ba5 b6 17.cxd6!?


17...bxa5 [17...cxd6!? 18.Bb4 Bf8 transposes to a line with 17.cxb6 cxb6. (Thus, White avoided 17.cxb6 axb6).] 18.dxc7 Qf8 19.Qa4! Bd7 [19...g4 20.Nc5 a6 (20...g3 21.h3 a6 22.Qxa5 Bxh3 23.Ne6 +-) 21.Qxa5 gxf3 22.gxf3 (22.Bxf3) 22...Bh3 23.Ne6!? axb5 24.Qxa8 Qxa8 25.c8Q+ Rf8 26.Qxa8 Rxa8 27.Rfd1 +/-; 19...a6 20.Qxa5 Nd7 +/- seems to be too passive (20...Bd7 - 19...Bd7); 19...Nd7 20.Qxa5 Rf6 21.Nb4] 20.Qxa5 [20.Nc5!?] 20...a6 [20...Bxb5 21.Qxb5 Rc8 22.Qb7! +-] 21.Nc5 Bxb5 [21...axb5 22.Nxd7 Rxa5 23.Nxf8 Rxc7 24.Rxc7 Bxf8 25.a3!? +/-] 22.Ne6! Bxe2 23.Nxf8 Rfxf8 Black has four pieces for a queen, but White's d6 and c7 pawns are very dangerous. 24.Rc6 (with the idea of Rd6, Rd8) seems to be strong.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Re
(Anonymous)
2006-07-13 12:13 pm UTC (link)
Hello Mr Golubev !

Thank you for your kind answers. Since my message, I have found an intereting analysis written by Soloviov from one of his games in an old Chess Informant (77/583), which tends to indicate black can take the knight : 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be2 e5 7.0-0 Nc6 8.d5 Ne7 9.Ne1 Nd7 10.Nd3 f5 11.Bd2 Nf6 12.f3 f4 13.c5 g5 14.Rc1 Ng6 15.Nb5 a6 !???? 16.cxd6 axb5 17.dxc7 Qd7 (and not 17...Qe8, which is the "refutation" given by Gallagher)18.Qb3 Ne8 19. Nc5 Qd6 20. Ne6 (20.Bb4 Qb6 is = + according to Soloviov, after either 21.d6+ Rf7 22.Khi Nxd6 23.Ne6 Bxe6 24.Qxe6 Nc8 25.Qe8+ Bf8 26.Bd1 Kg7 or 21.Kh1 Rf7 22.Rfd1 Bf8) and here, Soloviov criticizes his move 20...Qb6 + and recommends 20...Bxe6, when 21.Bb4 Qb6 + 22.Bc5 Qa5 23.dxe6 Nxc7 24.Bxf8 Kxf8 25.Rfd1 Qb6+ 26.Kh1 Nxe6 27.Qb4+ Kg8 is unclear. The problem of this line is that white can repeat the moves with 24.Bb4 Qb6+ 25.Bc5.
Of course, this is just an analysis and I think you may have a different point of view, but it indicates how deep and fascinating are the lines of the KID !

Best regards.

Jean-Michel.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Re
[info]mikhail_golubev
2006-07-14 01:52 pm UTC (link)
Many thanks. Honestly, I had doubts about 15...a6: I remember that neither Qd7 or Qe8 encouraged me much... This line requires really serious study. I only hope that I will find time for it in the near future.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Re
[info]mikhail_golubev
2006-07-27 12:07 am UTC (link)
This line is discussed at:
http://www.chesspublishing.com/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1147068584

(Reply to this) (Parent)

P.S.
[info]mikhail_golubev
2006-09-05 12:20 am UTC (link)
Review by Fernando Offermann can be found at
http://www.berlinerschachverband.de/rezensionen/0608/0608splitter.html
The article is in German language.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…